The Problem With Minimal Encouragers
When thinking of what constitutes a good listener, minimal encouragers are likely to come to mind. If you don’t know what ‘minimal encouragers’ are, you likely are familiar with hearing or saying them. Minimal encouragers are utterances such as: “Mhm,” “yeah,” “oh,” (nodding of the head), and a favorite in Wisconsin: “interesting.” A “minimal encourager” is a brief vocalization during a one-on-one conversation, which no doubt indicates you are attending to what the speaker is saying… except for those times when maybe you’re not.
My most recent Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coaching Circle group was discussing reflection statements and began contrasting them with minimal encouragers. A few of our group members found, through their recordings, they were very good at frequently uttering minimal encouragers (mhm, yes, oh), however, it was more difficult to form meaningful reflection statements in a conversation. Interestingly, one group member shared (about her minimal encouragers), “I sound just like those times when I’ve caught myself half-listening to my daughter… but I’m not really listening!” Aha! Minimal encouragers can sometimes feel like listening, even when one is not truly, actively listening.
Now, certainly, it’s not wrong to nod and coax a conversation along by adding an “mhm” or “interesting.” However, if we are creating the illusion of listening, that could be a concern.
In contrast, a reflection statement – starting with “You…” or “It’s…” shows interest in what the person is saying and tests a hypothesis about the deeper meaning. Reflection statements can keep both the listener and the client engaged and focused. The listener remains engaged by restating or summarizing parts of the information. In turn, the client doesn’t just feel – but in fact, knows their statements were heard and understood. They will gain insight because of the meaning the reflection statements added to the conversation.
Imagine a colleague talking to me about a change she is trying to implement in her school to better support students. She says, “It is just so hard to get others to understand this student need.” I could reply, “Yeah,” to show that I’m empathizing and listening. Or, I could add meaning to the conversation by saying, “It’s like you’re swimming upstream.” Now we both are on the same page with how exhausting the situation is. If I want to offer advice, I can more easily do it after I have effectively shown I can truly understand her situation.
Reflection statements provide a vital check-in time for the speaker to clarify the meaning of statements for the listener, moving the conversation to a place of clarity and depth. “Reflective listening is the primary skill on which MI is built. It is the mechanism through which practitioners express their interest, empathy, and understanding of clients” (Rosengren, 2009). It’s not enough for a listener to hear or focus on what was said. When listeners practice using reflection statements in addition to – or in place of – minimal encouragers, they fine-tune their skill set to more successfully move conversations forward.
Rosengren, D. B. (2009). Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kay Eibl
Owner & Instructor, A Better Listener
Over the last decade Kay has counseled individuals in both private and public settings. As a member of the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT), she is passionate about training professionals to fine-tune conversational practices and help students move toward increased motivation and behavior change.
262-565-2362 kay@abetterlistener.com
